I think we lost the "glue" for the docs.
Bill Maltby, LFS Organizational
bill at nospam.dot
Sat Mar 20 10:21:35 PST 2004
On Sat, 20 Mar 2004, Jeroen Coumans wrote:
> Bill Maltby, LFS Organizational said the following on 03/20/04 16:37:
> ><snip will add intor info>
> > I think we need this to be the target of "...organization.html" and what
> > is in there now needs to be a manifesto document. Or we could combine
> > the two I guess. But I would rather not _if_we_provide_links_ (see
> > last two paragraphs).
> As far as I understand, the current organization doc describes the whole
> LFS project. As such, it may be better to present it in the current
> location, with the above introduction added.
Sounds OK to me too.
> > [...] do normal "next", "prev", "up" and "top" types of jumps. I think
> > having those would increase the chance that the docs actually get read
> > and, therefore, provide some benefit.
> While I like your navigation links, I think that we shouldn't add them.
> They provide a linear navigation structure which is nowhere else in the
> current website, and also crosses different sections. This could (strong
> emphasis on could) cause confusion.
OK. I think then if we mention "... links below ...", that will clue
them to go on down to the other links below (you know how some folks
are, without a "pointer" ...).
Use fixed above line to mail me direct
More information about the website