I think we lost the "glue" for the docs.
jeroen at linuxfromscratch.org
Sat Mar 20 08:46:15 PST 2004
Bill Maltby, LFS Organizational said the following on 03/20/04 16:37:
> I think we need to have this, or something similar. It provides a little
> introductory text, offers a list of the sorts of documents that are
> (will be) available, provides quick navigation to the other docs (may
> not be the same on the website) and generally "holds it all together".
OK, I will add this info.
> I think we need this to be the target of "...organization.html" and what
> is in there now needs to be a manifesto document. Or we could combine
> the two I guess. But I would rather not _if_we_provide_links_ (see
> last two paragraphs).
As far as I understand, the current organization doc describes the whole
LFS project. As such, it may be better to present it in the current
location, with the above introduction added.
> If you agree, I'd ask you to get that added in, as I don't know if we
> could trust my zero-level knowledge to get all the stuff right. It had
> nav links to the other docs, and may not make complete sense unless we
> have nav links added to the other docs too. In the wiki version, we
> could do normal "next", "prev", "up" and "top" types of jumps. I think
> having those would increase the chance that the docs actually get read
> and, therefore, provide some benefit.
While I like your navigation links, I think that we shouldn't add them.
They provide a linear navigation structure which is nowhere else in the
current website, and also crosses different sections. This could (strong
emphasis on could) cause confusion.
Jeroen Coumans (jeroen at linuxfromscratch.org)
FAQ and Website Maintainer
More information about the website