GNU mailman and valid (and working!) pages
n-roeser at gmx.net
Wed Apr 21 14:08:37 PDT 2004
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Anderson Lizardo wrote:
> On Wednesday 21 April 2004 08:14, Nico R. wrote:
>> I'm always annoyed when reading pipermail archives (from LFS or
>> others), because I have my default foreground color set to white and
>> my default background color to black or pink or something strange for
>> debugging web pages.
>> The pipermail archives set the default bg color, but not fg, so I see
>> white text on white background - great!
> What do you suggest to fix this issue? add FGCOLOR="#000000" or remove
> BGCOLOR? I can handle that one for you.
I don't have a strong opinion; either way will work fine, but there
might still be problems with other colors (didn't look into these).
a) Adding the foreground color will result in black-on-white pages;
b) removing the background color in user's default colors.
I think, as the mailinglist archives are more or less many plain texts
and not web pages with lots of style, images, etc., b) would be fine
>> When I googled for the problem, I found your article, Jeroen:
>> I don't know Python as well, but I'm willing to fix at least that
>> color and invalid HTML problems. Creating nice XHTML+CSS pages won't
>> be a big problem as well, I assume.
> Jeroen is AFK right now, but should return still today.
I know; hope he's enjoying XML Europe. :-)
> Anyway, I
> remember Jeroen trying to implement nice templates for mailman but it
> showed so difficult to implement (due to hard-coded HTML code on
> Python files, AFAIR) that he gave up.
Yep, I read the mailman code which creates that stuff. Not very fine,
IMHO, but I'd give it a try, because I hate those broken pages...
> Also, there is a huge archive
> already processed with the default template (and even some pages with
> Jeroen's templates from when he was trying to implement them), that
> may need to be reprocessed to reflect the template change.
Hrm, good point. I didn't think about that. Is there an option to
reprocess a bunch of messages? If not, some scripting may help, but
that sounds rather difficult and I don't want to touch this - yet...
>> Would you like me to give this a try or won't it go into our mailman
>> on belgarath anyway?
> If you want to take the task and Jeroen approves, I don't see why this
> can't be accepted on belgarath.
However, I'll probably use mailman-2.1.4 for that experiment; belgarath
is running 2.1.2 at the moment, if I'm correctly informed.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the website