Voting Booth/Poll

Jeroen Coumans jeroen at
Sun Nov 9 14:29:55 PST 2003

Hi Bill Maltby, LFS Organizational. You said the following on 11/09/03
> Do I make a problem out of what was not a problem? Could be. But maybe I
> only see a *potential* problem that has not been publicly discussed yet.
> This might be due to different POVs, background, objectives or
> experiences. Or it could be different standards of "acceptable level of
> quality", whatever that means to each of us.

I think LFS as Open Source, which often follows the following release 
model: "Release Early, Release Often". Yes, there are exceptions (like 
Mozilla and OpenOffice), but they have industry backup. We only have 
users. And I think that the curious who want to try LFS will only try a 
stable release. Which means that, until you release, problems will not 
be found. A poll about the "releasability" doesn't have any advantage to 
me for finding problems. Besides that, I don't think anybody expects a 
"perfect" release like you make it sound. I even question the need from 
the community to consult everyone via a poll if a release is good enough 
to be released; most everyone relies on the developers, writes, QA to 
know if a release is good or not.
PS Bill - I always appreciate your opinion. It often makes for very nice 
discussions. I only wonder why we rarely agree on something? :-)

Jeroen Coumans (jeroen at
FAQ and Website Maintainer

More information about the website mailing list