[lfs-support] Brand new and confused. Mostly about the 7.5 book.

Ken Moffat zarniwhoop at ntlworld.com
Sun Mar 30 15:54:17 PDT 2014


On Sun, Mar 30, 2014 at 11:44:19PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> 
> swap : yes.  The traditional theory was 2 x physical memory, but I
> might go with more than that if physical memory is small (e.g. <=
> 4GB).  On what is now a small disk I would not go overboard with the
> swap.
> 
 I managed to come away from Al's post with the impression that he
had an 80GB disk, which is where "what is now a small disk" came
from.  He actually said that he thought LFS needed 80GB.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce



More information about the lfs-support mailing list