[lfs-support] /run directory: Maybe a bit off topic?

baho utot baho-utot at columbus.rr.com
Sun Mar 23 04:22:10 PDT 2014


On 03/23/2014 04:36 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Sat, 2014-03-22 at 09:59 -0400, baho utot wrote:
>> I am working on RPM-LFS-7.5 which is LFS with the rpm package manager.
>>
>> I would like to adhere to Filesystem Hierarchy Standard 2.3 so my linux
>> systems file system layout matches/closely matches my FreeBSD systems.
>> When was the /run directory introduced and what package(s) required
>> moving run-time data from /var/run to /run?
>>
> Just be aware that the FHS was last updated in January 2004 - a little
> more than a decade ago - and as such is a bit out of date with regard to
> how Linux distros are doing things.
>
> In particular, it's unaware of both the /sys virtual filesystem (added
> around 2006 as I recall), and the introduction of /run (in 2011 or so).
> So while it's a useful guideline, I'd suggest not getting too hung up on
> compliance...
>
> Simon.
>

Just trying to match what I have on my unix boxes.  Even if it hasn't 
been updated doesn't mean it's not relavent.
I understand adding /sys but /run makes no sense as it could have been 
/var/run which by the way IS in the standard.





More information about the lfs-support mailing list