[lfs-support] LFS-7.4

Ken Moffat zarniwhoop at ntlworld.com
Fri Nov 29 16:23:02 PST 2013


On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
> >
> > I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
> >
> > I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout
> > that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories
> 
> I really don't know but I can make some guesses.  uname --machine gives
> x86_64.  I wouldn't be suprised if some packages that assume a multilib 
> system use that value to insist on /lib64  or /usr/lib64.
> 
>    -- Bruce

 Cross-LFS has always done that for pure64.  It's a _long_ while
since I last built clfs x86_64-64 and many things have changed, but
the main difference is that clfs still uses a specfile - their build
is now quite different from how LFS has evolved.

 If you do something like that, then yes, a few _blfs_ packages will
probably get confused by the absence of /lib64.  OTOH, you would get
a nice clean system - but the build for x86_64 will be somewhat
different from what is currently in LFS.

 I've a feeling that someone, perhaps our late colleague Andy, used
to build 64-bit LFS without the symlink - but I've no idea of the
details about how to do it (and that was before libstdc++ and g++
became required for building gcc, so the details would have to change
for gcc-4.8).

 This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds.

ĸen
-- 
das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce



More information about the lfs-support mailing list