zarniwhoop at ntlworld.com
Fri Nov 29 16:23:02 PST 2013
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 11:35:19AM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Baho Utot wrote:
> > Is it possible to build LFS-7.4 on x86_64 without the /lib64 symlink?
> > I have tried to do so but libstd++ in the chapter 5 tool chain dies.
> > I would like to build for x86_64 and have the same filesystem layout
> > that i686 has ie without the lib64 directories
> I really don't know but I can make some guesses. uname --machine gives
> x86_64. I wouldn't be suprised if some packages that assume a multilib
> system use that value to insist on /lib64 or /usr/lib64.
> -- Bruce
Cross-LFS has always done that for pure64. It's a _long_ while
since I last built clfs x86_64-64 and many things have changed, but
the main difference is that clfs still uses a specfile - their build
is now quite different from how LFS has evolved.
If you do something like that, then yes, a few _blfs_ packages will
probably get confused by the absence of /lib64. OTOH, you would get
a nice clean system - but the build for x86_64 will be somewhat
different from what is currently in LFS.
I've a feeling that someone, perhaps our late colleague Andy, used
to build 64-bit LFS without the symlink - but I've no idea of the
details about how to do it (and that was before libstdc++ and g++
became required for building gcc, so the details would have to change
This message will self-destruct in 5 seconds.
das eine Mal als Tragödie, dieses Mal als Farce
More information about the lfs-support