[lfs-support] Grub 2.0 problem

Simon Geard delgarde at ihug.co.nz
Wed Nov 14 02:52:40 PST 2012


On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 14:18 -0500, alex lupu wrote:
> 2. In general, if grub 0.97 could be used here, does it have limitations in
> other complicated configurations, present and in the foreseeable future?

If I remember correctly, grub1 can't be built on a 64-bit system. That
is, it can boot one just fine, but it can't be compiled without using a
32-bit compiler.

Simon.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/attachments/20121114/8cf6c03c/attachment.sig>


More information about the lfs-support mailing list