Problem Booting up the new system ?

Flan Alflani falflani at gmail.com
Mon Nov 15 17:13:23 PST 2010


2010/11/12 littlebat <dashing.meng at gmail.com>:
> On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 00:34:31 +0300
> Flan Alflani <falflani at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> 2010/11/11 littlebat <dashing.meng at gmail.com>:
>> > On Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:31:50 +0000
>> > dgfhfgh dfghdfgh <solo9300 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Sincerely,
>> >>
>> >> http://www.Q8h.net
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2010 23:04:33 +0800
>> >> > From: dashing.meng at gmail.com
>> >> > To: lfs-support at linuxfromscratch.org
>> >> > Subject: Re: Problem Booting up the new system ?
>> >> >
>> >> > On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 12:04:05 +0000
>> >> > dgfhfgh dfghdfgh <solo9300 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Hello all,
>> >> > > after going thought the book  and try to boot the new system,
>> >> > > the Bootloader work fine but when i try to boot the root
>> >> > > filesystem my screen display  alot of color (attached photo)
>> >> > > without any message or anything. I try to do the book again
>> >> > > it seem to be compiling ok without anything i could find. dont
>> >> > > know what i did wrong and or what to do next, therefore, if
>> >> > > anyone could help or point me to the right direction. thxbook
>> >> > > SVN-20101027host lfcliveCD
>> >> >
>> >> > Maybe, you can attach your .config file to the list, so someone
>> >> > can test it on their machine.
>> >> >
>> >> > Maybe, you can copy your LFS root directory to another machine to
>> >> > test if it is only happen on that machine.
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > littlebat
>> >> > --
>> >> > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
>> >> > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
>> >> > Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>> >>
>> >> sorry forget to add the attachment :) here is a link
>> >> http://linuxfromscratch.pastebin.com/mxmgFkV8
>> >>
>> >
>> > I tested your .config on my LFS6.6 system, I didn't change anything
>> > else except my system is vmware i386 machine, so the kernel config
>> > program changed some things automatically, see the "diff" result
>> > between the modified .config and yours:
>> > http://linuxfromscratch.pastebin.com/DLuCd850
>> >
>> > Boot from the new compiled kernel, no any exception happened. After
>> > compiled the vmware disk driver(Fusion MPT device support) into
>> > kernel, I can boot and login into system with this kernel without
>> > error.
>> >
>> > So, I think maybe your hardware need some special kernel configs or
>> > your hardware has run into some new kernel bugs. I think.
>> >
>> > Good luck.
>> >
>> > littlebat
>> > --
>> > 开源文化实验室 http://www.learndiary.com/
>> > 孟大兴网站 http://www.openlong.com/
>> > --
>> > http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
>> > FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
>> > Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>> >
>>
>>
>> littlebat,
>>
>> thx for looking into my problem, However i have  a question on chapter
>> 6.16. GCC-4.5.1  about the test suite results ?
>>
>> Is this ok :
>>
>>
>> ../gcc-4.5.1/contrib/test_summary
>> cat <<'EOF' |
>> LAST_UPDATED: Obtained from SVN: tags/gcc_4_5_1_release revision
>> 162774
>>
>> Native configuration is x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>>
>>               === gcc tests ===
>>
>>
>> Running target unix
>> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c  -O0  (test for excess
>> errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c  -O1  (test
>> for excess errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c
>> -O2  (test for excess errors) FAIL:
>> gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c  -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer
>> (test for excess errors) FAIL:
>> gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c  -O3 -g  (test for excess
>> errors) FAIL: gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-exprparen.c  -Os  (test
>> for excess errors)
>>
>>               === gcc Summary ===
>>
>> # of expected passes          61316
>> # of unexpected failures      6
>> # of expected failures                165
>> # of unsupported tests                833
>> /sources/gcc-build/gcc/xgcc  version 4.5.1 (GCC)
>>
>>               === libgomp tests ===
>>
>>
>> Running target unix
>>
>>               === libgomp Summary ===
>>
>> # of expected passes          1029
>>               === libmudflap tests ===
>>
>>
>> Running target unix
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O2) (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c/fail31-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) execution test
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) execution test
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass45-frag.c (-O3) output pattern test
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c/pass46-frag.c (-O3) (test for excess errors)
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx execution test
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx ( -O) execution test
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O2) execution test
>> FAIL: libmudflap.c++/pass41-frag.cxx (-O3) execution test
>>
>>               === libmudflap Summary ===
>>
>> # of expected passes          1414
>> # of unexpected failures      13
>>               === libstdc++ tests ===
>>
>>
>> Running target unix
>>
>>               === libstdc++ Summary ===
>>
>> # of expected passes          7071
>> # of expected failures                95
>> # of unsupported tests                339
>>
>> Compiler version: 4.5.1 (GCC)
>> Platform: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
>> configure flags: --prefix=/usr --libexecdir=/usr/lib --enable-shared
>> --enable-threads=posix --enable-__cxa_atexit --enable-clocale=gnu
>> --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-multilib --disable-bootstrap
>> --with-system-zlib
>> EOF
>> Mail -s "Results for 4.5.1 (GCC) testsuite on
>> x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu" gcc-testresults at gcc.gnu.org &&
>> mv /sources/gcc-build/./gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum
>> /sources/gcc-build/./gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.sum.sent &&
>> mv /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.sum
>> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.sum.sent
>> &&
>> mv /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.sum
>> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.sum.sent
>> &&
>> mv /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc+
>> +-v3/testsuite/libstdc+
>> +.sum /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc+
>> +-v3/testsuite/libstdc++.sum.sent &&
>> mv /sources/gcc-build/./gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.log /sources/gcc-build/./gcc/testsuite/gcc/gcc.log.sent
>> &&
>> mv /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.log /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.log.sent
>> &&
>> mv /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.log
>> /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libmudflap/testsuite/libmudflap.log.sent
>> &&
>> mv /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc+
>> +-v3/testsuite/libstdc+
>> +.log /sources/gcc-build/./x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc+
>> +-v3/testsuite/libstdc++.log.sent && true
>> --
>> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
>> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
>> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>
> How about your interesting boot screen?
>
> Gcc testing result is too complex to analyze for me. The results can be
> different in different environments. For example, the results is
> different when I set "MAKEFLAGS=-j 2" compare to don't set
> "MAKEFLAGS=-j 2", and the result in my 32 bit system is also different
> compare to
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/build-logs/6.6/core2duo/test-logs/076-gcc .
> So after some simple studies on my Gcc test result, I just omited these
> test FAILs when I build my first LFS6.6 :-)
>
> --
> 开源文化实验室 http://www.learndiary.com/
> 孟大兴网站 http://www.openlong.com/
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
>

is this something i should worry about or it just simple expected
(ignored) failure in the posix/annexc test on 6.9. Glibc-2.12.1?

root:/sources/glibc-build# grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: [/sources/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock6.out] Error 1
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock7.out] Error 1
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock9.out] Error 1
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock11.out] Error 1
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock12.out] Error 11
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock14.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/rt/tst-cpuclock1.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [rt/tests] Error 2
make[2]: *** [/sources/glibc-build/elf/tst-xmmymm.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [elf/tests] Error 2
make: *** [check] Error 2



More information about the lfs-support mailing list