grub2: error: fiel not found
delgarde at ihug.co.nz
Fri Mar 26 01:34:40 PDT 2010
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 20:04 +0000, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On 25 March 2010 20:00, Mike McCarty <Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> > A nit, but nits are important in this context, shouldn't that be
> > /dev/sda16 ? Or did I miss something?
> No, this is grub2 - on x86, disks still start at zero, but dos partitions
> have their "real" number (1-4 for primary, 5+ for extended) so (hd0,15)
> is indeed sda15.
Yeah... because having them inconsistent is less confusing than having
them both start at zero?
You say *dos* partitions - does grub2 behave differently for other types
of partition table?
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the lfs-support