LFS-6.6, Stage2, glibc, nscd.c:442

Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Tue Jun 1 12:19:49 PDT 2010

Paul Rogers wrote:

> As seems
> indicated by the current situation, someone should adopt a QC role, and
> have one system that trails, i.e. has exactly the package versions
> specified in the HSR, and verifies that each version of LFS does in fact
> install flawlessly with those prerequisites.  

Volunteers welcomed.

> I began programming in 1966, FORTRAN II, on an IBM-1620

I started in 1965.  I still have my FORTRAN (not II) manual.  I also 
used an IBM-1620.  The mass storage device was punched cards.

Also IBM 7090/7094, IBM 360 Series 60, and CDC 6600.

>> You don't have any standing to 'expect' anything from us. You can 
>> suggest, but with your attitude, my reaction is to push back and
>> say no, even if that's wrong.
> Petulance? You need ego strokes for "being helpful"? Such is 
> "professionalism", eh? People report problems and you blow them off? 
> Why are you involved?

No, not petulance, frustration.  You report a problem doing things 
*your* way and we *did* try to help.  We ask for your help in confirming 
the problem in a way we can duplicate and you say no.  Who is being 
petulant here?

 > So what's your argument? "We'll put whatever we please in our book,
 > and whether it works for you or not is none of our concern?" Why
 > bother?

My argument is that we will fix problems that we can confirm.  I still 
don't see why you won't help us help you.

   -- Bruce

More information about the lfs-support mailing list