UDEV - Not Leaving Well Enough Alone

Mike McCarty Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net
Mon Nov 23 10:46:53 PST 2009

alupu at verizon.net wrote:


> which creates (in /dev) a number of krazy devices named,
> fd0u1120  fd0u1600  fd0u1722  fd0u1760  fd0u1920
> fd0u720  fd0u820 fd0u1040  fd0u1440  fd0u1680
> fd0u1743  fd0u1840  fd0u360   fd0u800  fd0u830
> In the past, I was able to avoid this creation
> of unnecessary fd nodes.  (Ironically, cluttering up

In what sense unnecessary? Do your floppy drives not
support those modes? There are tools which use the
name of the device to select their mode of operation,
and if you don't have a /dev node for that then they
don't operate properly or even refuse to operate.

I can't recall in which tools I've encountered that
off the top of my head, but I have encountered some
which don't respond to what setfdprm does.

Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!

More information about the lfs-support mailing list