verify build files for LFS

Bruce Dubbs bruce.dubbs at
Fri Mar 20 09:54:01 PDT 2009

OK, Let's see if I can get this posted correctly.

Bruce Dubbs wrote:

>> Mike McCarty wrote:
>> They can't both be correct. The one in "stable" seems to match
>> the actual source file. The one in "development" seems wrong.
> Stable is correct.  Development hasn't been updated in a while.  
> inetutils should be version 1.6 for -dev anyway.  Perhaps I should 
> remove the -dev download  directory for LFS as we don't have an 
> automated notification of new packages and we do have a wget list.
> Thoughts?
>   -- Bruce

More information about the lfs-support mailing list