verify build files for LFS
bruce.dubbs at gmail.com
Fri Mar 20 09:54:01 PDT 2009
OK, Let's see if I can get this posted correctly.
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Mike McCarty wrote:
>> They can't both be correct. The one in "stable" seems to match
>> the actual source file. The one in "development" seems wrong.
> Stable is correct. Development hasn't been updated in a while.
> inetutils should be version 1.6 for -dev anyway. Perhaps I should
> remove the -dev download directory for LFS as we don't have an
> automated notification of new packages and we do have a wget list.
> -- Bruce
More information about the lfs-support