verify build files for LFS
Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net
Thu Mar 19 01:56:54 PDT 2009
Chris Staub wrote:
> Mike McCarty wrote:
>> Ok, gunzip thinks there is no error, but when I pulled that
>> file from
>> it's different from the wget-list file's URL target
>> So, which one is correct? the one from the GNU project page, which
>> does not match the SHA1SUMS file, or the one from the LFS page,
>> which does? Presumably, any difference between what GNU provides
>> and what LFS actually needs would be provided by a corresponding
>> patch file.
> I just downloaded the inetutils 1.5 tarball from the LFS ftp, and from
> gnu, and both are identical. Also, the SHA1SUM given in the SHA1SUMS
> file in the 6.4 dir on the LFS download site matches what I get for both
> ineutils tarballs...
That's odd. I got different files, and gunzip didn't complain
that either was corrupt. That's confusing.
> Why it's saying "FAILED" for you, I don't know.
It's because the files have different content.
I just re pulled from both sites, and
$ ls -l gnu-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz lfs-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz
-rw-rw-r-- 1 jmccarty jmccarty 1390529 Jun 29 2007
-rw-rw-r-- 1 jmccarty jmccarty 1390529 Jan 4 22:20
$ diff -s gnu-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz lfs-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz
Files gnu-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz and lfs-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz
Using the link you helpfully provided:
$ wget -N -c -nv ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs/lfs-packages/6.4/SHA1SUMS
02:54:59 URL: ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs/lfs-packages/6.4/SHA1SUMS
[11,704] -> ".listing" 
02:55:00 URL: ftp://ftp.lfs-matrix.net/pub/lfs/lfs-packages/6.4/SHA1SUMS
[5,653] -> "SHA1SUMS" 
$ grep inetutils-1.5.tar.gz SHA1SUMS
$ sha1sum lfs-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz
$ sha1sum gnu-site/inetutils-1.5.tar.gz
Perhaps the SHA1SUMS file is incorrect?
Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN.
This message made from 100% recycled bits.
You have found the bank of Larn.
I speak only for myself, and I am unanimous in that!
More information about the lfs-support