johnneylee.rollins at gmail.com
Wed Dec 16 13:28:15 PST 2009
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 6:07 AM, William Immendorf <will.immendorf at gmail.com
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:33 AM, Mykal Funk <mykalfunk at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I can say it isn't the hardware. I recompiled the kernel with
> > CONFIG_HZ_100 option set, then rebooted with that kernel. I started the
> > glibc build from 5.7.1 and 12 hours later under high load the clock is
> > still accurate. Problem fixed. Thanks for the ideas, folks. They helped
> > me to learn which is the most important thing in my book.
> Thing is, is that you mentioned that you had other computers. Which
> ones are they?
> Congratulations, sorry I couldn't help with that, it was a very peculiar
Don't let Johnylee distract you.
This was out of line in my opinion. William, you don't need to start another
pissing contest with me, it won't happen.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the lfs-support