LFS version (was blank)
linuxfromscratch at sf.porterfield.net
Tue Dec 15 20:16:18 PST 2009
> From: Chris Staub
> Generally, yeah, but about the only reason (that I know of) that anyone
> would use 6.3 is because it's what's on the most recent livecd, in which
> case the host would certainly be the same as the book anyway.
I can see why someone might want to do that for ease of following, but I
chose LiveCD 6.3 and book 6.5 figuring the LiveCD would give me a good
starting host environment but still let me have the latest version
available. This is my second LFS build, though I think I would have
been just as "daring" on my first. JMHO.
More information about the lfs-support