chris at beaker67.com
Tue Dec 15 11:49:14 PST 2009
On 12/15/2009 02:33 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> 2009/12/15 Mike McCarty<Mike.McCarty at sbcglobal.net>:
> Right (for My Machine, My Rules), but historically we've seen
> problems when people try to use newer toolchains than are
> in the book (i.e. build failures).
> In general, it's very hard to recommend that anyone use an
> LFS book older than the latest release. For BLFS, at least for
> those desktop packages which are in BLFS, the development
> book is often far more up to date (although, at the moment,
> it probably still has a lot that hasn't changed since the 6.3
Generally, yeah, but about the only reason (that I know of) that anyone
would use 6.3 is because it's what's on the most recent livecd, in which
case the host would certainly be the same as the book anyway.
More information about the lfs-support