Linux-2.6.30.9 build failure fixed & new problem show up

Ken Moffat zarniwhoop73 at googlemail.com
Mon Dec 7 17:16:02 PST 2009


2009/12/7 Mykal Funk <mykalfunk at gmail.com>:
> Ken Moffat wrote:

>>
>> Do you have CONFIG_COMPAT_VDSO=y ?  If so, try turning it off.
 whoops, if not try turning it on.
>> I'm not sure where it appears in menuconfig, but the help says:
>>
>> config COMPAT_VDSO
>>         def_bool y
>>         prompt "Compat VDSO support"
>>         depends on X86_32 || IA32_EMULATION
>>         ---help---
>>           Map the 32-bit VDSO to the predictable old-style address too.
>>         ---help---
>>           Say N here if you are running a sufficiently recent glibc
>>           version (2.3.3 or later), to remove the high-mapped
>>           VDSO mapping and to exclusively use the randomized VDSO.
>>
>>           If unsure, say Y.
>>
>> LFS-5.0 used gcc-2.3.2 so it will need this set to Y.
>>
>> ĸen
>>
> No. I compiled the kernel without COMPAT_VDSO. Do you think it needs
> included? The host is running Glibc 2.3.3. I think system may be a LFS
> 5.1. I didn't write a file anywhere to tell me, but I know it was build
> April 2004 with the then stable book.
>
> Thank,
> Mykal Funk
> --
 Yes, all the main hits on google for "inconsistency detected by ld.so"
appear to suggest that will fix it.  Sorry for the thinko in my earlier
reply.

 You can determine the version of glibc by running /lib/libc.so.6

ĸen
-- 
After tragedy, and farce, "OMG poneys!"



More information about the lfs-support mailing list