LFS 6.4 Book HTML

Simon Geard delgarde at ihug.co.nz
Thu Apr 9 01:40:25 PDT 2009

On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 10:59 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> A point release should go through full QA, which is why it would
> be a big deal, require full directory structure creation, regresion
> testing, etc. Someone would have to go through the full build
> following the book exactly.

Seems to me that if it's eligible to go in the errata, it's eligible to
go into the book proper. After all, if we're telling people to read the
errata to deal with errors in the book, surely we're taking care not to
put new errors into the errata?

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/attachments/20090409/551acd24/attachment.sig>

More information about the lfs-support mailing list