LFS 6.4 Book HTML
delgarde at ihug.co.nz
Wed Apr 8 00:45:12 PDT 2009
On Tue, 2009-04-07 at 10:48 -0500, Mike McCarty wrote:
> Simon Geard wrote:
> > If we were *really* following standard practice, we'd be applying the
> > errata changes against the 6.4 book, and putting a 6.4.1 book on the
> > website to replace it.
> Can't dispute. You'd do a "point release".
Right, which I assume is what the other poster was arguing for. The idea
of an errata page is very much a legacy of hardcopy publishing - for
purely electronic documents, the software model of fix and re-release
makes much more sense.
No idea how big a deal it would be to do, but in theory it's highly
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the lfs-support