Packages less (406)
hjwidmaier at web.de
Tue Jan 8 11:14:47 PST 2008
martin welsh wrote:
> Download address apparently no longer functional.
> Will less-416 be a suitable substitute?
I upgraded all my machines to less-416 and build a new LFS with it. I
did not notice any changes, certainly no adverse effects. I'd say: Just
go with 416. I wouldn't consider less to be a critical application,
anyway. I.e., even if it has bugs, it will not affect the rest of your
system, especially not compilations.
More information about the lfs-support