problems to make glibc-2.3.6 : /tools/include/asm/errno.h:4:31: error: asm-generic/errno.h: No such file or directory
ken at linuxfromscratch.org
Mon Feb 12 14:24:54 PST 2007
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 10:21:02PM +0100, Kai Ulrich wrote:
> after fixing that I got following error:
> In file included from version.c:33:
> /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/version-info.h:2: error: missing terminating " character
> /mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/version-info.h:3: error: missing terminating " character
> version.c:40: error: syntax error before string constant
> make: *** [/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build/csu/version.o] Error 1
> make: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.6/csu'
> make: *** [csu/subdir_lib] Error 2
> make: Leaving directory `/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-2.3.6'
> make: *** [all] Error 2
> lfs at frunk:/mnt/lfs/sources/glibc-build$
Did you delete the glibc-2.3.6 and glibc-build directories after
the previous errors ? If not, please do and then try again. It
would be useful if you can log the output, e.g.
'make >../glibc-buildlog 2>&1 | tee'
If you did delete the directories, possibly there are problems with
the host packages. I don't have any logs from LFS-6.2, but the
creation of version-info.h will be fairly similar to the glibc-2.5 I
built last week - it ran a sed on a list of files, I think to
convert one or more spaces to exactly two spaces, and then to add a
It would be instructive to look at the first few lines of
version-info.h to see what is there. I'm suspicious about the
ubuntu version of /bin/sh - bash 3.1 and 3.2 have needed various
fixes. Or perhaps it isn't bash, I read somewhere that they install
dash as the shell for their their bootscripts, to speed them up.
What do you get for '/bin/sh --version' ? If it is bash-3.1 and
less than 3.1.17, look to see if ubuntu has an updated version
available. Similarly 'sed --version' although I assume all recent
distros are using 4.1.5.
I have a (very vague) memory of seeing this before. Ah, the good
news is that google knows about it, see
and the bad news is that I don't know the solution. In that case,
the poster was doing an install alongside ubuntu (on the same
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
More information about the lfs-support