rc.local doesn't get run?
dbn.lists at gmail.com
Tue Feb 6 01:22:46 PST 2007
On 2/6/07, Bauke Jan Douma <bjdouma at xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Btw., here's another reference to rc.local:
> Redhat..., hm. So again, praytell, what /is/ Linux.
Well, the only "standard" I can think of is the LSB, and I don't see
anything about rc.local in the system initialization chapter.
And if it is a really widely accepted standard, then why would a huge
distro like SuSE decide to break it and call their file boot.local for
no reason whatsoever? I'm not saying we shouldn't do this, but I don't
think our system is broken if we don't.
More information about the lfs-support