unifdef in stable, not development?
chris at beaker67.com
Tue Oct 17 09:40:51 PDT 2006
contact at logarytm.com wrote:
> Ive followed the guide so far using the packages of 6.2. In chapter 6.7 of
> the LFS book one should patch the headers with the unifdef. This doesnt
> apply to stable(6.2) right?
If you're using 6.2, then you shouldn't even be seeing anything
referring to unifdef. I am confused as to what exactly you are doing.
More information about the lfs-support