x86_64 build what to use LFS or CLFS
luca.dionisi at gmail.com
Sat Oct 14 04:41:52 PDT 2006
On 10/13/06, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/13/06, Luca Dionisi <luca.dionisi at gmail.com> wrote:
> > But, CLFS says:
> > > The one "flaw" in LFS is that it has always been based on an x86 class processor.
> > > [....] the x86-only LFS is no longer ideal.
> > So, what is true?
> That's absolutely true. LFS is only ever tested on x86. That said, if
> you know what you're doing, you can natively build an x86_64 system.
> You just have to know where to deviate from the book.
All right, now I know my options.
Nevertheless it should be pointed out in the book that it has been
tested only in x86 machines.
my 2 cents.
More information about the lfs-support