Glibc-2.5 question

Dan Nicholson dbn.lists at gmail.com
Mon Nov 6 07:53:06 PST 2006


On 11/6/06, Luca <liliana.perossa at fastwebnet.it> wrote:
> Hi everyone!
>
> I have a question about Glibc-2.5 (probably stupid so sorry in advance),
> but just in case:
>
> In glibc-2.5/include/features.h header lines 306,307 says (taken from
> vanilla tarball):
>
> #define    __GLIBC__    2
> #define    __GLIBC_MINOR__    4
>
> but shouldn't lists:
> #define  __GLIBC__ 2
> #define __GLIBC_MINOR__ 5
>
> since it's a 2.5 release?

Good catch. It's in upstream, too. Is it breaking things?

http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/libc/include/features.h.diff?r1=1.43&r2=1.44&cvsroot=glibc

I read on the libc-alpha list that glibc-2.5.1 will be coming soon.

http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-10/msg00021.html

--
Dan



More information about the lfs-support mailing list