A way to keep track of packages while installing LFS
breakthestate at gmail.com
Thu Feb 2 12:54:42 PST 2006
I suggest paco.
On 2/2/06, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/2/06, David Fix <6gwlse302 at sneakemail.com> wrote:
> > > Not true. Support for kernel features is the responsibility of the
> > > user application. I run Beagle with inotify support, and I don't have
> > > inotify support in linux-libc-headers.
> > >
> > Ah, ok. :) Thanks for letting me know about that. :)
> No problem. It's all part of the weirdness of kernel headers. Just
> because our glibc wasn't built with inotify support doesn't mean that
> an application can't access an available kernel feature. It's just up
> to the user app to handle this interface. For instance, Beagle
> includes inotify.h in it's source tree and has runtime detection to
> see if inotify is available.
> As I understand it, very few applications actually need a specific
> kernel feature or need to access the kernel directly, so this
> situation doesn't come up that often. But I'm not a programmer and
> have no idea what kernel interfaces even look like, so I'll pass you
> the salt to take that statement with.
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
More information about the lfs-support