A way to keep track of packages while installing LFS

break thestate breakthestate at gmail.com
Thu Feb 2 12:54:42 PST 2006

I suggest paco.
On 2/2/06, Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/2/06, David Fix <6gwlse302 at sneakemail.com> wrote:
> > > Not true.  Support for kernel features is the responsibility of the
> > > user application.  I run Beagle with inotify support, and I don't have
> > > inotify support in linux-libc-headers.
> > >
> >
> > Ah, ok.  :)  Thanks for letting me know about that.  :)
> No problem.  It's all part of the weirdness of kernel headers.  Just
> because our glibc wasn't built with inotify support doesn't mean that
> an application can't access an available kernel feature.  It's just up
> to the user app to handle this interface.  For instance, Beagle
> includes inotify.h in it's source tree and has runtime detection to
> see if inotify is available.
> As I understand it, very few applications actually need a specific
> kernel feature or need to access the kernel directly, so this
> situation doesn't come up that often.  But I'm not a programmer and
> have no idea what kernel interfaces even look like, so I'll pass you
> the salt to take that statement with.
> --
> Dan
> --
> http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-support
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page

More information about the lfs-support mailing list