upgrade of libc-2.3.3.so to libc-2.3.6.so problematic?

lynx.abraxas at freenet.de lynx.abraxas at freenet.de
Mon Aug 28 10:24:28 PDT 2006


So, I compiled with gcc 4.1.1 with patches and sed-commands but:

- configure command differs:

5.1.1
     --disable-profile --enable-add-ons=linuxthreads .br
     --libexecdir=/usr/lib --with-headers=/usr/include .br
     --without-cvs

6.2
     --disable-profile --enable-add-ons .br
     --enable-kernel=2.6.0 --libexecdir=/usr/lib/glibc

Does  the  different  --libexecdir,  --enable-add-ons  and the missing --with-
headers, --without-cvs matter?


I used the 6.2 configure  and  the  check  has  errors(see  below).  It  seems
tstdiomisc.out has some mismatch and tst-rwlock6.out might have failed because
of "timeout too short". Is this sirous or can I use the make for my system?

Thanks again,
Lynx

grep Error glibc-check-log
make[2]: *** [/usr/src/glibc/glibc-build/stdio-common/tstdiomisc.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [stdio-common/tests] Error 2
make[2]: [/usr/src/glibc/glibc-build/posix/annexc.out] Error 1 (ignored)
make[2]: *** [/usr/src/glibc/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock6.out] Error 1
make[1]: *** [nptl/tests] Error 2
make: *** [check] Error 2


cat /usr/src/glibc/glibc-build/stdio-common/tstdiomisc.out
t1: count=5
sscanf ("12345", "%ld", &x) => 1, x = 12345
sscanf ("12345", "%llllld", &x) => 0, x = -1
sscanf ("12345", "%LLLLLd", &x) => 0, x = -1
sscanf ("test ", "%*s%n", &x) => 0, x = 4
sscanf ("test ", "%2*s%n", &x) => 0, x = -1
sscanf ("12 ", "%l2d", &x) => 0, x = -1
sscanf ("12 ", "%2ld", &x) => 1, x = 12
sscanf ("1 1", "%d %Z", &n, &N) => 1, n = 1, N = -1
expected "nan NAN", got "0.000000 0.000000"
expected "inf INF", got "inf INF"
expected L"nan NAN", got L"expected L"inf INF", got L"inf INF"

cat /usr/src/glibc/glibc-build/nptl/tst-rwlock6.out
1st timedwrlock done
1st timedrdlock done
2nd timedwrlock done
started thread
child calling timedrdlock
1st child timedrdlock done
2nd child timedrdlock done
joined thread
1st timedwrlock done
1st timedrdlock done
2nd timedwrlock done
started thread
child calling timedrdlock
1st child timedrdlock done
2nd child timedrdlock done
joined thread
1st timedwrlock done
1st timedrdlock done
2nd timedwrlock done
started thread
child calling timedrdlock
1st child timedrdlock done
timeout too short
failure in round 2





More information about the lfs-support mailing list