Reasons for not removing the kernel source tree
lfs-01 at thewizardstower.org
Tue Aug 15 11:41:07 PDT 2006
* Dan Nicholson <dbn.lists at gmail.com> [2006-08-14 18:30]:
> On 8/14/06, Angel Tsankov <fn42551 at fmi.uni-sofia.bg> wrote:
> >>> The LFS 6.1.1 book says that "the Linux source tree is often retained
> >for a long time." What reasons may one have to do this?
> >> Building external kernel modules would be the main reason (ATI, Nvidia,
> >Aha, and iptables probably, right?
> Iptables should build on its own. It uses netfilter from the kernel,
> but should provide its own headers or use the ones installed in
In my experience Fuse also needs to have the kernel sources (and
properly configured too, not just unpacked).
More information about the lfs-support