Reasons for not removing the kernel source tree

Dan Nicholson dbn.lists at gmail.com
Mon Aug 14 13:38:12 PDT 2006


On 8/14/06, Angel Tsankov <fn42551 at fmi.uni-sofia.bg> wrote:
> The LFS 6.1.1 book says that "the Linux source tree is often retained for a long time." What reasons may one have to do this?

Building external kernel modules would be the main reason (ATI, Nvidia, etc.)

--
Dan



More information about the lfs-support mailing list