Reasons for not removing the kernel source tree
dbn.lists at gmail.com
Mon Aug 14 16:15:53 PDT 2006
On 8/14/06, Angel Tsankov <fn42551 at fmi.uni-sofia.bg> wrote:
> >> The LFS 6.1.1 book says that "the Linux source tree is often retained for a long time." What reasons may one have to do this?
> > Building external kernel modules would be the main reason (ATI, Nvidia, etc.)
> Aha, and iptables probably, right?
Iptables should build on its own. It uses netfilter from the kernel,
but should provide its own headers or use the ones installed in
More information about the lfs-support