is LFS LSB compliant?
jaqui_greenlees at yahoo.ca
Sat Oct 8 02:02:15 PDT 2005
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Thu, 6 Oct 2005, Chakkaradeep C C wrote:
> >> hi all,
> >> i just want to know whether LFS is LSB or FHS
> > LSB - no. The LSB is for providers of binary
> software, among other
> > things it mandates RPM as a package manager,
really? I never saw a package manager requirement in
> particular version of
> > the c++ libraries.
true, since it is trying to be a standard, for
software portability between distros.
No doubt you can build the
> necessary packages, and
> > the specific version of gcc, to achieve compliance
> with a particular
> > version of the LSB, but most people don't think
> that is worthwhile.
only because most people don't think standardising the
core is a good idea, they want to break comatability
between distros. just to follow in ms' footsteps and
lock customers into using thier branded versions
> > You might want to read Ulrich Drepper's recent
> blog on the LSB:
> > Ken
plain text email only.
html is spam.
unrequested attachments are spam.
Find your next car at http://autos.yahoo.ca
More information about the lfs-support