patches for tools?
Chakkaradeep C C
chaks.lfs at gmail.com
Wed Jun 15 04:26:04 PDT 2005
> I'm using the LFS-6.1-testing versions (gcc-3,4,3), libstdc++ is fine
> here. You're saying that your test_summary doesn't match what you
> logged from running make check ? I've just compared one of mine (for a
> Celeron III) and they look the same to me.
oh..nice to hear :-), i used Fedora Core 3 as my host and people tell
me it is because of that gcc tests fails....maily libstdc++...is it
correct or mayb or is it the gcc version of lfs 6.0??
can i use gcc-3.4.3 with binutils-220.127.116.11.2 or i have to go along
with 6.1 toolchain?
> There was a comment on lkml a few weeks ago about HJL's binutils
> patches, but I don't recall what the consensus was. As to 'safe',
> without extensive testing, the best you can ever say is "works for me".
please can you elaborate on what you said Ken..i didnt understand what
you have written :-(..
> I try not to comment on the glibc testsuite, because I *really* don't
> understand it.
More information about the lfs-support