jeremy at chaos.org.uk
Sun Jun 5 15:33:23 PDT 2005
On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 04:20:05PM -0500, David Jensen wrote:
> LFS was blog'd today
Today? I'm pretty sure I noticed this a couple of days ago.
> comments were the usual non-problems from the non-enlightened.
I think that's unduly harsh. Sure, a couple of comments were pretty
non-enlightened but they got intelligent replies and there wasn't a
flame-fest. That's way ahead of the game for the Intarweb!
All in all I think it was good publicity for LFS. It gave a pretty
good impression of what LFS is for, what it's like to build and run,
and why you might want to do it. It even made the point that "LFS is,
in the strict definition of the term, not a distribution.", which is
pretty insightful for this kind of drive-by review.
More information about the lfs-support