LFS 6.0 kernel 188.8.131.52 -> 2.6.10 ?
frank.schafer at t-systems.cz
Fri Jan 14 02:39:05 PST 2005
There will never arise the nessessary to upgrade anything if you upgrade
The kernel was, is and will ever be self contained. The only dependency:
Have the kernel include files of the kernel, glibc was built against,
On Fri, 2005-01-14 at 08:25 +0000, Jeremy Henty wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 12:11:40AM +0100, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> > Hmmm... I thought that glibc should always be rebuilt whenever you
> > install a new kernel.
> ??? I have been running LFS 4.1 for ages now, I install every new
> kernel and have *never* upgraded glibc. Of course this is kernel 2.4,
> but I'd be *very* surprised if 2.6 was any different in this respect.
> Jeremy Henty
More information about the lfs-support