LFS 6.0 kernel 188.8.131.52 -> 2.6.10 ?
fost at hotmail.com
Thu Jan 13 00:56:02 PST 2005
roger21 <roger21 at free.fr> wrote in news:41E605A2.80701 at free.fr:
> Nathan Coulson a écrit :
>> On Thu, 13 Jan 2005 05:18:07 +0100, Benoît VILA <bvila at free.fr> wrote:
>>>if i want to update my kernel, is it enough to install the new
>>>linux-libc-header package and the new kernel package? what should be
>>>re-compiled (except the kernel of course)?
>> You should never replace your linux-libc-headers package on your
>> system. Simple compile a new kernel, and overwrite /boot/lfskernel
>> and /boot/System.map [filenames may vary, please consult the book you
> oh .. ok but isn't it to disturbing to have different linux-headers from
> the linux kernel ?
no - the linux-libc-headers are (as the name suggests) headers for use by
libc (and other apps) not the kernel. When a new package is built that
references the linux-libc-headers, it must use the same version as that
used to build libc, so the ABI stays the same.
More information about the lfs-support