OK, damnit, here's a solution

Ken Moffat ken at kenmoffat.uklinux.net
Sun Sep 19 11:53:36 PDT 2004


On Sat, 18 Sep 2004, Jason Gurtz wrote:

> On 18-Sep-04 11:34, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> >  Got any subject or id to identify an example of what you're complaining
> > about ?  I tend to forget about 5-day old spam.  Or maybe I'm doomed to
> > (iso-8859-15).
> >
> > Ken
>
> >From Headers:
> Subject: =?iso-8859-1?q?995_-_82_-_41_-_=E0=ED=E3=EB=E8_=E9_=F1=EA=E8=E9?=
>
> As Rendered by Thunderbird:
> 995 - 82 - 41 - àíãëè é ñêèé
>
> ...as seen many many times on various LFS lists.
>
> Cheers,
>
> ~Jason
>

 I never saw it until you gave me this header, because SA here had
already trapped it (and this is SA-2.55 which I _really_ need to get
around to updating!).  All I can suggest is that maybe you need to run
sa-learn more often on the spam it missed ?  Analysis from my SA
follows.  Oh, and pine thought it was Windows-1251.

Good luck.

Ken

X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=4.5 required=3.0
	tests=BAYES_70,BODY_8BITS,IN_REP_TO,NO_REAL_NAME,REFERENCES
	version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
X-Spam-Report:   ---- Start SpamAssassin results
  4.50 points, 3 required;
  *  1.1 -- From: does not include a real name
  * -0.4 -- Has a In-Reply-To header
  * -0.0 -- Has a valid-looking References header
  *  2.3 -- BODY: Bayesian classifier says spam probability is 70 to 80%
  [score: 0.7547]
  *  1.5 -- BODY: Body includes 8 consecutive 8-bit characters
  ---- End of SpamAssassin results
X-Spam-Flag: YES

    [ The following text is in the "Windows-1251" character set. ]
    [ Your display is set for the "ISO-8859-15" character set.  ]
    [ Some special characters may be displayed incorrectly. ]


-- 
 das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce




More information about the lfs-support mailing list