gnumeric and -Os optimization (was: Re: Compiler optimization flags in building LFS-5.1.1)

Nico R. n-roeser at gmx.net
Thu Sep 9 04:11:24 PDT 2004


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ken Moffat wrote:
[...]
> But, -Os in
> gnumeric (and probably in other parts of gnome) on x86 is a bad idea,
> it breaks things.

Ken, you have mentioned this problem several times on some lists. This
is either a gnumeric or a gcc bug. Have you reported this to the
gnumeric development list/maintainers?

Cheers,
- -- 
Nico
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBQDpcxI5uhYOGv4URAvH+AKC4xtgVfF8Eh/etJ858kO86A/RjsgCgkrsm
06O6AGYjseQJIRyRonJEIIQ=
=Gto5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the lfs-support mailing list