glibc make check error (LFS 5.1-pre1)

Jack ostroffjh at
Thu Mar 25 18:01:18 PST 2004

On 2004.03.25 20:44, jeremy at wrote:
> Which glibc are you using - the date-tagged one that's currently
> listed in5.1-pre, or the new -rc1 one that Ryan put together.  At any 
> rate, using a roughly similar machine to yours (Athlon XP 2500+), I 
> have no test failures in either one of those glibc tarballs.  See 
> what happens when you start with a clean extract of the tar.bz2 file.
I used the date-tagged per the book (as I downloaded a few weeks ago).  
I'll try rebuilding clean.  I've already readjusted the toolchain (page 
following glibc).  Does it matter if I do/don't put it back?

> It could, if we can determine it to be a problem in the glibc 
> tarballs instead of "user error" - but with so many of us building on 
> i686 successfully, it seems questionable about whether it's a glibc
> problem.
I certainly would not yet rule out user error....

More information about the lfs-support mailing list