GCC 3.3.1 vastly different failure #'s (ch 5 lfs 5.0, 2nd pass)
ken at kenmoffat.uklinux.net
Sat Mar 13 04:17:58 PST 2004
On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, zoltan wrote:
> Howdy folks,
> So are these what would be considered "vastly" different results for the
> second pass of GCC 3.3.1 in LFS-5.0 in chapter 5? Seems to me they
> are...Am I the only one who's seen this, or is there perhaps something more?
> BTW, my host system is an LFS 4.1 system, which runs great. I've
> followed the LFS-5.0 instructions pretty much to the letter, except I've
> replaced --prefix=/tools with --prefix=/my-own-tools globally (right
> from the get-go, including SPEC file changes, etc. (consistently), so it
> shouldn't be an issue...
> Any ideas?
> === g++ Summary ===
> # of expected passes 7016
> # of unexpected failures 1166
> === libstdc++-v3 Summary ===
> # of expected passes 258
> # of unexpected failures 195
Something like this used to be seen in maybe the back end of last year.
I don't remember the details, but I think I was one of the people bitten
by it. If I'm right, it's either down to using a patch which enforces
/tools (we were moving from /stage1 to /tools), or you missed changing a
prefix somewhere. If I'm wrong, try searching the list archives for gcc
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
More information about the lfs-support