feedback re tmpfs
allard at nospam.nl
Mon Jan 26 01:22:58 PST 2004
On Monday 26 January 2004 00:18, Greg Schafer wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:37:36PM +0100, Allard Welter wrote:
> > Again J?rg's post is helpful here. Also I use the size parameter. Since
> > /dev/ shm is not used by much (a test by libc as far as I can gather) at
> > the moment.
> I'm still scratching my head trying to figure out how tmpfs crept into this
> thread... This post my me is still very much current and helpful in
> debunking myths and misconceptions surrounding tmpfs and /dev/shm and
Sorry, my fault trying to figure this all out one drunken evening. Thanks for
the pointer (only searched for tmpfs not /dev/shm).
allard at quicknet.nl
More information about the lfs-support