feedback re tmpfs

Greg Schafer gschafer at zip.com.au
Sun Jan 25 15:18:00 PST 2004


On Sun, Jan 25, 2004 at 01:37:36PM +0100, Allard Welter wrote:
> Again J?rg's post is helpful here. Also I use the size parameter. Since /dev/
> shm is not used by much (a test by libc as far as I can gather) at the 
> moment.

I'm still scratching my head trying to figure out how tmpfs crept into this
thread... This post my me is still very much current and helpful in
debunking myths and misconceptions surrounding tmpfs and /dev/shm and
frinds:

http://archives.linuxfromscratch.org/mail-archives/lfs-dev/2003-October/039568.html



More information about the lfs-support mailing list