chapter 5 - gcc-3.3.1 pass 2

Greg Schafer gschafer at zip.com.au
Tue Jan 13 13:50:52 PST 2004


On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 05:43:32PM -0000, Abhishek Sharma wrote:
> I have now spent about 5 hours in build time compiling the packages before
> this one. Unfortunately I did not know that it was mandatory to follow the
> $LFS/tools directory and insted I opted for the $LFS/build/tools directory.

Oops. This aspect has been made clearer in the current CVS version of the
book.

> Are there
> any other '/tools' strings hardcoded into any other patches (i couldn't find
> any) that could have caused this error.

The specs patch is the main offender of hardcoding /tools. There should be
no others.



More information about the lfs-support mailing list