GCC 3.2.1 Optimizations and Via C3 Ezra CPU
Bryan K. Walton
zxcvbnm at tds.net
Tue Feb 17 10:54:28 PST 2004
Thank you for your email. Hmmm, now to decide whether I want
to spring for the newer C3s.
On Sat, Feb 14, 2004 at 10:29:51PM -0500, Joel Miller wrote:
> On Sat, 14 Feb 2004 21:04:36 -0600, Bryan K. Walton <zxcvbnm at tds.net>
> > I have a question regarding compiler optimizations for the Via
> >C3 Ezra processor. I did a little searching around on the web and found
> >CFLAGS="-march=i586 -m3dnow -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
> >CXXFLAGS="-march=i586 -m3dnow -O3 -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer"
> >Now, that makes sense to me. However, when I issue a "uname -m" on
> >this box, it reports that it is a i686. And sure enough, when I
> >compile gcc on this box, without any optimizations, it seems to be
> >identifying the host as i686-pc-linux-gnu. Any ideas what might be
> >going on here. Is gcc incorrectly identifying hardware on the box?
> >I'm using GCC 3.2.1. Or can I specify i686 in those three
> >optimization lines?
> >Bryan Walton
> IIRC the C3 processor is a 686 processor but it lacks the CMov instruction
> that other 686 processors have. Thus default i686 instructions will call
> CMOV and you will get an error stating an illegal instruction has been
> called. I also seem to remember hearing that newer C3's didnt have this
> problem. Take what I say with a grain of salt, as I'm trying to recall all
> this from memory.
> Registered LFS User 6929
> Registered Linux User 298182
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
More information about the lfs-support