substitution of linux version in LFS-6.0

Steve Crosby fost at hotmail.com
Thu Dec 23 13:11:55 PST 2004


Don Shuff <donito at woh.rr.com> wrote in
news:20041223121113.40060404.donito at woh.rr.com: 

<snip>

> 
> so looking at all the website for the linux-libc-headers, I see two
> files that would correspond to the 2.6.9 kernel: 
> 
> linux-libc-headers-2.6.9.0.tar.bz2
> 
> and
> 
> linux-libc-headers-2.6.9.1.tar.bz2
> 
> Would I use the 2.6.9.1 file since it's newer or should I use 2.6.9.0
> since there is no kernel with a version number of 2.6.9.1 ?  Or does
> it really matter? 
> 

the linux-libc-headers (llc) had a bug in the 2.6.9.0 release, so they made 
a 2.6.9.1

the llc 2.6.9.1 version works fine with linux-2.6.9

(although it causes problems with util-linux-2.12l and higher, due to a 
PAGE_SIZE change in llc)

- --
Steve Crosby



More information about the lfs-support mailing list