substitution of linux version in LFS-6.0
donito at woh.rr.com
Thu Dec 23 06:46:24 PST 2004
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 12:51:46 +0100
charlie <charlie.cllin at free.fr> wrote:
> J. Greenlees a écrit :
> > charlie wrote:
> >> Hi everyone,
> >> Has anybody tried using linux 2.6.9 in LFS 6.0 rather than 126.96.36.199
> >> during the installation. Is it considered safe and stable?
> >> Thank you
> >> CH COLLIN
> > building 2.6.9?
> > or running on 2.6.9?
> no, building it, i mean replacing package linux-188.8.131.52 with
> linux-2.6.9, that's it. I guess there's no roblem as 2.6.9 is newer but
> still in the same version.
Am I correct in assuming that if you chose to "build" LFS 6 with kernel 2.6.9 that you also have to use the linux-libc-headers-184.108.40.206 as well for sections 5.6.1 and 6.9.1 in the book.?
> > if latter see thread:
> > fatal kernel to old on lfs6
> > message-id 20041222134202.2728bc37.donito at woh.rr.com
> > Jaqui
> FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/lfs/faq.html
> Unsubscribe: See the above information page
More information about the lfs-support