substitution of linux version in LFS-6.0

J. Greenlees jaqui at telus.net
Thu Dec 23 02:40:26 PST 2004


charlie wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Has anybody tried using linux 2.6.9 in LFS 6.0 rather than 2.8.6.1 
> during the installation. Is it considered safe and stable?
> 
> Thank you
> CH COLLIN
building 2.6.9?
or running on 2.6.9?
if latter see thread:
fatal kernel to old on lfs6
message-id 20041222134202.2728bc37.donito at woh.rr.com

Jaqui

-- 
========================================

only plain text format email accepted.

smaller file size, no virus transfer
no proprietary file formats.

========================================
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3162 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/pipermail/lfs-support/attachments/20041223/6a613779/attachment.bin>


More information about the lfs-support mailing list