substitution of linux version in LFS-6.0

J. Greenlees jaqui at
Thu Dec 23 02:40:26 PST 2004

charlie wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Has anybody tried using linux 2.6.9 in LFS 6.0 rather than 
> during the installation. Is it considered safe and stable?
> Thank you
building 2.6.9?
or running on 2.6.9?
if latter see thread:
fatal kernel to old on lfs6
message-id 20041222134202.2728bc37.donito at



only plain text format email accepted.

smaller file size, no virus transfer
no proprietary file formats.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3162 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <>

More information about the lfs-support mailing list