LFS doesn't need to deny it's own self

Helmut Jarausch jarausch at remove.igpm.rwth-aachen.de
Mon Aug 2 00:55:42 PDT 2004


rick wrote:
> Helmut Jarausch wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> invoking
>> uname -a
>> on my LFS system, I get
>> ...... GenuineIntel unknown GNU/Linux
>> Wouldn't it be much nice if it showed LFS 5.1 here?
> 
> 
> this is the hardware-platform field of the output.
> the same as uname -i
> 
>>
>> Does anybody know where to patch this and to apply such a patch
>> per default?
>>
> 
> there is a new patch coreutils-5.2.1-uname-2.patch
> http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/patches/downloads/coreutils/
> 

Thanks for the pointer, but this uname still doesn't display the
'distribution' (LFS in my case)
I believe I have seen the name of the distribution (Redhat or Suse) anywhere.

Helmut.



More information about the lfs-support mailing list